![]() Low-quality pages written by far-from-fluent English speakers, or by people who weren't putting much effort into quality.The peak of Squidoo's activity occurred in October of 2012, according to data from Quantcast: The April 2014 Penguin update also produced only a slight effect, perhaps slightly harming Squidoo. The famous Panda/Farmer update in February of 2011, which devastated many content farms, seemed to not affect Squidoo much, perhaps even helping it. The site seemed to grow organically as more people were attracted to it by a wide range of factors, including its fun and quirky nature, its rich and diverse features, the positive community there, and of course, the growing potential for earning money and attracting a large audience.įollowing the history of Google's algorithm changes relative to Squidoo's traffic patterns suggests that Google algorithm changes did not directly drive the rise and fall of the site. This system attracted me to the site, as someone who puts a lot of thought into my writing and my work. ![]() The site was also silly and fun: it had a system of "Squidliking" and "Squid angels" who would "bless" pages, as sort of a peer-review system, intended to maintain the site's integrity and reward authors for the best pages. Whereas HubPages struck me as cold and a bit self-promotional, I found Squidoo to be a more supportive place, where established users were welcoming to newer ones. What made Squidoo stand out to me was the positivity and supportive atmosphere of the site's community. Squidoo started out with a burst of activity, which was followed by slow and steady growth, which started to pick up pace in late 2009.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |